Sunday, May 11, 2008

Blatant display of censorship in the United Kingdom

LONDON -- The anti-sex activists rammed through a brand new law in the United Kingdom that serves as one purpose and one purpose only: censoring porn, in direct violation of the free expression clause in the UK constitution.

This is more proof that anti-sex feminists not only hate men's sexual expression, but I can now conclude they also hate women. Why am I saying this? Because women are involved with the porn industry of their own free will 22 times out of every 25, or 88% of the time.

Say it aloud with me, folks: CENSORING PORN HURTS ALL WOMEN. This has been true since the beginning of time.

And censoring things that certain people don't like isn't new. Just last year, the US Supreme Court let stand a ban on sex toys in Alabama, passed by the legislature in Montgomery. A couple of years ago, a similar law passed by the leaders in Atlanta, Ga. was also upheld. And, most infamously, a Canadian law pushed by two American anti-sex feminists, Catherine MacKinnon and the late Andrea Dworkin, was upheld by the activist judges in Ottawa 16 years ago.

I have one question to ask. Has porn ever killed anyone? So far, I have yet to see pornographic material kill anyone.

Ren and Ernest have more on this subject.

0 comments: